lxe: (Default)
что все люди делятся на способных и неспособных вообразить отрицательные значения привычных характеристик природных феноменов. (Отрицательную частоту, отрицательный потенциал, отрицательную энергию, и т.д.)

Обычные меритократические выводы следуют. Ну, в смысле, что неспособных можно лишать любых гражданских прав, включая право на жизнь.

Настаивать не буду, но и отказываться на все случаи жизни не готов. Это не люди, это прото-люди. В большей степени, чем эмбрионы (которые пока не дали повод обвинить себя ни в чем подобном). И притом, скорее всего, по выбору.

A Smooth One

May. 25th, 2025 11:41 pm[syndicated profile] amigofriend_feed


Последний номер из записанных мной на концерте в прошлую субботу. Дальше будет только обобщающий рассказ про каквсёбыло. Вещь относящаяся к "изобретателю электричества" в джазовой гитаре (как Мадди Уотерс в блюзе, (Ц) "Перекрёсток") Чарли Христиану. Играют все!

Posted by Dan Mitchell

I admire Ronald Reagan because he walked the walk and talked the talk, which basically means he said the right things and did the right things.

Here’s another example of his wisdom.

If Reagan’s analysis sounds familiar, it may be because you’re a long-time reader and remember my 13th Theorem of Government.

The message of that theorem is that people theoretically like freebies from government.

But if they are asked whether they are willing to pay more taxes to finance a new program, they suddenly become much more frugal.

In other words, people are Bernie Sanders when asked if they want goodies financed by other people’s money, but they turn into Rand Paul when asked if they want handouts financed with their own money.

There’s even proof of this. I shared polling data back in 2016 showing that supporters of Bernie Sanders were almost completely unwilling to pay the taxes needed to finance his big-government agenda.

I also recommend the second-half of this video from the Fraser Institute, which reaches the same conclusion.

All of this sounds like good news. When asked to look at both costs (taxes) and benefits (handouts), people are not fans of big government.

However, I’ll close with two depressing political observations.

  1. People are susceptible to supporting big government if it’s financed by borrowing (i.e., their children will pay for it).
  2. People are susceptible to supporting big government if they think all the taxes will be imposed on other people (usually the rich).

Observation #1 is why I fear an eventual debt crisis. And “eventual” is now likely to be much sooner than I would have guessed only five years ago.

Observation #2 is very frustrating because there’s so much data showing that there are not enough rich people to finance European-sized government.

P.S. One positive observation is that people also tell pollsters they favor smaller government.

Posted by Victorino Matus

A local corrections officer tells me prison breaks are not like in the movies. If it happens on your watch, "there's no slap on the wrist." You will be held accountable. The investigation will also seek ways to prevent future breakouts. I suggest a ban on large posters of Rita Hayworth.

But speaking of accountability, our Andrew Stiles reviews Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson's Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and his Disastrous Choice to Run Again.

"Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson are going to make a lot of money from their new book, Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. Some people find this aggravating, and for good reason. The vast majority of Americans (86 percent as of February 2024) used common sense to arrive at the correct conclusion long before the 81-year-old president shuffled on stage and bragged about beating Medicare. Biden was cognitively and physically unfit to serve another term in office. No shit. He was arguably unfit to serve at all. The scandal played out in plain sight, fueled by Democrats and mainstream journalists doing what they do best: scolding the American people for having the wrong opinions.

"'Our only agenda is to present the disturbing reality of what happened in the White House and the Democratic presidential campaign in 2023–2024,' the authors write in the introduction. It's a carefully worded admission that their goal is not to provide a full account of the cover-up of Biden's decline, because that would involve a thorough examination of how mainstream journalists, who don't officially work 'in the White House' or on behalf of Democratic campaigns (but often in practice), helped perpetuate the lies.

"Original Sin is an illuminating and often infuriating exposé. It's packed with damning accounts from (mostly anonymous) Democratic sources who all waited until after the election to stop lying. Numerous villains are identified: Biden himself, his family, his inner circle, and the Democratic establishment. Meanwhile, the reporters who failed to expose the scandal when the stakes were higher are generally portrayed as sympathetic, well-meaning professionals with poor bullshit detectors."

You know what's surprising? Just how close the British were to winning the Revolutionary War. Professor Allen C. Guelzo explains in his review of Rick Atkinson's The Fate of the Day: The War for America, Fort Ticonderoga to Charleston, 1777-1780.

"It is one of Atkinson’s convictions in both The British Are Coming and The Fate of the Day that Britain and its leaders were, even with the keenest of intentions, their own worst enemies. Britain’s North American colonies emerged from the trauma of the Seven Years’ War as grateful and devoted children of the Hanoverian crown and its newest representative, George III. What the imperial planners in London never quite fathomed was that this reverence was built on generations of improvised self-government in America, which the Americans saw no reason to surrender once the British government decided to impose an unprecedented series of direct taxes on them. It was not that the taxes were necessarily onerous; it was that they were imposed roughshod, without a by-your-leave to American habits.

"It exploded when the Boston Tea Party turned to the outright destruction of property. No one was angered more seriously than the king, who insisted that unless the Americans were brought to heel, the rest of the empire—Ireland, India, and the Caribbean—would go the same way.

"The British generals to whom this task was given—Sir William Howe, Sir Henry Clinton, Earl Cornwallis, 'Gentlemanly Johnny' Burgoyne—were neither nitwits nor tyrants, and if we are to judge by the opening chapters of The Fate of the Day, they were remarkably close to winning their war in 1777. Burgoyne’s capture of Fort Ticonderoga in July 1777 should have guaranteed the success of his plan to move down the Hudson River Valley and cut off rebellious New England from the rest of the American rebel states; Howe’s dramatic combined-arms operation to capture Philadelphia steamrolled George Washington’s Continental Army at Brandywine in September, threw off a counterattack at Germantown in October, and consigned the Continentals to their dreadful winter encampment at Valley Forge.

"But Howe’s adventure to Philadelphia left him unable to support Burgoyne when 'Gentlemanly Johnny' was forced into surrender at Saratoga in October 1777. Howe himself had already concluded that the war was unwinnable and never lifted a finger to disturb Washington at Valley Forge. The Saratoga victory convinced the French that the British were vulnerable to a serious effort to recover France’s New World empire, and with the French entrance into the war, the principal theaters of operations had to be shifted elsewhere by Britain. Britain’s generals in America would still win a few dramatic victories, but they would lose the biggest battle at Yorktown in 1781, and after that, American independence only required the official stamp of the 1783 peace treaty."

Did you know Alexander Hamilton played a key role in the Battle of Yorktown? It's mentioned in Ron Chernow's eponymous bestseller. Chernow is now out with a new book, Mark TwainPatrick Parr gives us a review.

"Twain lived a packed life. At 17, out of frustration toward [his brother] Orion and a desire for adventure, he left Hannibal for New York and Philadelphia, writing articles and taking printing jobs, exasperated by the explosion of immigrants. 'I always thought the eastern people were patterns of uprightness,' Twain wrote to Orion, 'but I never before saw so many whisky-swilling, God-despising heathens as I find in this part of the country.' Chernow also notes Twain’s evolving feelings over seeing black people free for the first time. Back then at least, Twain preferred talking with 'a good, old-fashioned negro' back in Missouri.

"Eventually, Twain went back to work for Orion, now married and living in Keokuk, Iowa. Chernow could have filled another thousand pages tracking Twain’s movements in his 20s; the printer/riverboat pilot/writer/pro-Confederacy militia soldier (for two weeks)/Nevada silver rush miner was in constant motion. Chernow notes 'early February 1863' as the time when the first 'Mark Twain' byline appeared in print. To Twain, the pseudonym, as Chernow puts it, 'was short and melodious—a perfect spondee.'

"By 31, Twain had slowed down… a little, and was looking for companionship. 'Beneath his ribald mockery,' Chernow writes, 'Twain was a suppressed romantic who needed a spotless soul to worship.' To describe Twain’s marriage to Olivia Langdon, or 'Livy,' Chernow again dives into archival correspondence, while also using long-ago efforts of Twain estate editor Dixon Wecter and his 1949 collection, The Love Letters of Mark Twain. The result is a sweeping, 34-year love story that somehow endured losing their first-born son Langdon at 19 months. Twain’s devotion to Livy is admirable, but more so was Livy’s patience and stamina. ... As far as Chernow documents, Twain was faithful to Livy, and when she passed in 1904, the then mega-famous writer was devastated, and for the last six years of his life, he appeared at times embittered and lost, his north star vanished."

The Weekend Beacon commemorates this Memorial Day with a review by Colonel Peter Mansoor (ret.) of Jonathan Horn's The Fate of the Generals: MacArthur, Wainwright, and the Epic Battle for the Philippines.

"Instead of relying on War Plan Orange, which envisioned the provisioning of the Bataan Peninsula and nearby island fortress of Corregidor for an extended siege, MacArthur ordered Wainwright’s troops to defend forward along the beaches of Lingayen Gulf. A well-trained and equipped corps might have been able to execute the new plan, but the North Luzon Force was anything but. As Japanese forces shattered his lines, Wainwright fought a delaying action back to Bataan, just as War Plan Orange had envisioned. But with one huge difference—the food required to sustain U.S. and Filipino forces in the peninsula had been positioned instead in the Luzon central plain to support the revised (and overly ambitious) plan. The Japanese captured most of the supplies, while Wainwright’s troops went on half rations as soon as they dug in on Bataan. There they fought courageously as their stamina slowly dwindled, their defeat only a matter of time.

"MacArthur would not be present to witness the end. Ordered to Australia by the president, MacArthur, his family, and a small staff departed on PT boats in March 1942 on a harrowing journey to Mindanao, and from there by air to Darwin. Wainwright would hold as long as he could, which was April for Bataan and a month later for Corregidor and the rest of the Philippines. As Wainwright shuffled off to a prisoner of war camp, MacArthur built a new army and began the long journey back through the tortuous jungles of New Guinea.

"MacArthur never forgave Wainwright for surrendering the entire Philippines to the Japanese, even though he had little choice in the matter. MacArthur’s anger was better directed at the War Department, but he made his displeasure clear by sabotaging the award of the Medal of Honor to Wainwright, who spent three-plus years in grueling conditions as a prisoner of war wondering whether he would be court martialed for the surrender of his command. He needn’t have worried. The War Department promoted him to full general while in captivity and after his release he was given a prominent place of honor on the USS Missouri at the Japanese surrender in Tokyo Bay, and he likewise was present at the Japanese surrender in the Philippines. Wainwright returned to the United States to massive parades in his honor. President Truman gave him the ultimate honor when he awarded Wainwright the Medal of Honor, long delayed by MacArthur’s pettiness."

This review will be posted on Monday, May 26.

Happy Memorial Day.

Vic Matus
Arts & Culture Editor
Washington Free Beacon

The post Weekend Beacon 5/25/25 appeared first on .

Posted by Andrew Stiles

Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson are going to make a lot of money from their new book, Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. Some people find this aggravating, and for good reason. The vast majority of Americans (86 percent as of February 2024) used common sense to arrive at the correct conclusion long before the 81-year-old president shuffled on stage and bragged about beating Medicare. Biden was cognitively and physically unfit to serve another term in office. No shit. He was arguably unfit to serve at all. The scandal played out in plain sight, fueled by Democrats and mainstream journalists doing what they do best: scolding the American people for having the wrong opinions.

"Our only agenda is to present the disturbing reality of what happened in the White House and the Democratic presidential campaign in 2023–2024," the authors write in the introduction. It's a carefully worded admission that their goal is not to provide a full account of the cover-up of Biden's decline, because that would involve a thorough examination of how mainstream journalists, who don't officially work "in the White House" or on behalf of Democratic campaigns (but often in practice), helped perpetuate the lies.

Original Sin is an illuminating and often infuriating exposé. It's packed with damning accounts from (mostly anonymous) Democratic sources who all waited until after the election to stop lying. Numerous villains are identified: Biden himself, his family, his inner circle, and the Democratic establishment. Meanwhile, the reporters who failed to expose the scandal when the stakes were higher are generally portrayed as sympathetic, well-meaning professionals with poor bullshit detectors.

"Many reporters took the White House denials at face value," the authors write. Yes, we know. But why? Are journalists just lazy? Incompetent? Was there some other reason so many of them were so willing to parrot Democratic talking points that defied credulity? While promoting the book last week, Thompson explained that even the people orchestrating the cover-up were shocked at how easy it was to manipulate the self-anointed "guardians of democracy" in the press. "We were sort of amazed at some of the stuff we were able to spin reporters on," the source said. "You guys should not have believed us so easily." This quote does not appear in the book. It should have been the opening line.

The authors are relatively unsparing when conveying the extent to which the Democratic Party went along with the charade. They interviewed numerous (mostly anonymous) donors, politicians, and party leaders who witnessed Biden's decline, which often reminded them of relatives who suffered from Parkinson's or dementia. They kept their mouths shut because they didn't want to piss off "The Politburo," the inner circle of longtime Biden aides who were essentially running the country while the nominal president was "at best a senior member of the board." Everyone was afraid of Jill Biden, who ruthlessly snuffed out dissent with the help of her reviled henchman, Anthony Bernal, described by some as "the worst person they had ever met." An anonymous donor, who saw a feeble Biden fail to recognize a former longtime aide in August 2023, tries to rationalize their inaction. "We weren’t going to change that he was running, and no one wanted to be on the outside in case he did win," the donor says. "So no one said anything. No one wanted to hear it, and if you said anything, you got your head chopped off."

Others shrugged it off because they didn't really care if Biden was fit to serve as long as he had a chance of beating Trump. "He just had to win, and then he could disappear for four years—he’d only have to show proof of life every once in a while," said a longtime Biden aide granted anonymity to admit fraud. Another motivating factor was the general agreement among party elites that Kamala Harris, the most likely alternative, was even less capable than a walking corpse. For some of the key players, it's unclear what they were thinking at the time, but they're still lying about it now. According to the authors, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who often sat in for Biden at meetings with foreign leaders and helped translate his incoherent ramblings when he did show up, claims to have "continually witnessed the president fully able to meet the moment" right up to the debate with Donald Trump. The contents of Original Sin (and common sense) suggest this is some ass-covering bullshit.

When it comes to the media's role in the cover-up, there is no serious attempt to explain why so many journalists were such willing participants. The motivations were likely the same: fear of losing access, fear of losing to Trump, and so on. There is one brief passage in the book about a mystery reporter from a "national news outlet" who scrapped a story on Biden's decline in 2024 after White House counselor Steve Ricchetti berated her over the phone. He threatened to wage a full-scale assault on her credibility, and the reporter caved. The authors clearly view Ricchetti, not the weak-kneed journalist, as the uniquely villainous main character in this episode, as if every White House didn't act this way. To paraphrase Donald Trump: When you're a Democrat, they let you do it. Most readers will wonder about all the other journalists who were bullied into submission, cowed from speaking truth to power, and why there's only one example in the book. (There are definitely more.)

It's maddening, really. Go back and watch the tape of Tapper insisting (without evidence) that Biden was mentally "sharp" in September 2023. We know now that in the preceding months, Biden had turned in a series of awful performances at fundraisers that left some donors worried that he "might not make it to Election Day." This was around the time, the authors reveal, that a handful of unnamed Biden aides became convinced the president was too braindead to serve another term. They started leaking stories about Biden's limitations to Thompson, who was one of the only mainstream journalists to report on Biden's decline. Was Thompson the only reporter these aides ever contacted? Almost certainly not. What happened? In June 2024, Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes of the Wall Street Journal published a story on Biden's decline. As promised, they were instantly denounced as right-wing fabulists—not just by White House aides and other Democrats. Many so-called journalists joined the pile on, including Tapper's former CNN colleague Oliver Darcy, who slammed the Journal's (accurate) reporting for "playing into a GOP-propelled narrative that the 81-year-old president lacks the fitness to hold the nation’s highest office."

Tapper's response to the Journal story was also in line with White House talking points. He echoed Darcy's concerns about the sourcing, while noting that the paper was owned by conservative billionaire Rupert Murdoch. He interviewed one of Biden's most ardent supporters, Sen. Chris Coons (D., Del.), who slammed the media for obsessing over "minor slips" that were "typical of anyone who's keeping a demanding 14 hours a day schedule." That wasn't true, but Tapper quickly changed the subject to Taiwan. Last week, Megyn Kelly asked the CNN host why he didn't invite Linskey and Hughes on his show to discuss their reporting. Tapper's defensive response was positively Bidenesque. "I don't know what the booking situation was," he said. "Megyn, if we're gonna do this, let's just stick to the facts here, OK?" Ahead of the book's release, Tapper went out of his way to praise the "heroic reporters" and denounce the "smear campaign" against them. How gracious of him.

The Original Sin rollout feels like a coordinated public relations campaign, because it is. To prepare for the book launch, Tapper hired a crisis communications expert who advised his former colleague, Zoom masturbator Jeffrey Toobin, and his former boss, Jeff Zucker, who juiced the network's ratings by promoting charismatic scumbags such as Andrew Cuomo and Michael Avenatti before being forced out in 2022 for concealing a romantic relationship with a subordinate. It was a clever move, not only because Tapper is a notoriously thin-skinned hack, but because CNN and other mainstream outlets are struggling to overcome a very real (and self-inflicted) crisis. It was also a clever move for Tapper to team up with Thompson, who joined CNN as a paid contributor in August 2024. Unlike his coauthor, Thompson maintains a modest degree of credibility when it comes to (gently) criticizing the media's failure to expose the truth, which he did at the White House Correspondents' Dinner earlier this year. Just not in his best-selling book.

Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again
by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson
Penguin Press, 352 pp., $32

The post Decline Absolution: Sympathetic, Well-Meaning Journalists With Poor Integrity appeared first on .

Posted by Allen C. Guelzo

We have now arrived on the cusp of the 250th anniversary of American independence, and speaking as a veteran of the 1976 Bicentennial, the word that comes most readily to mind for the celebrations 50 years later is flaccid. The excuse which usually follows is that we live today in a sea of political hatred, retribution, and instability, which makes it hard to celebrate the events that made it all possible.

But it’s worth remembering that in 1976, we had also just passed through the final debacle of Vietnam the year before; had just witnessed the national agony of Richard Nixon and Watergate two years before; and were caught on the horns of an economic crisis so mystifying that New York City was one day away from declaring bankruptcy. Yet, we managed to throw a stupendous national party that featured Operation Sail, a state visit from Queen Elizabeth II, and a Bicentennial Wagon Train that crossed the entire continentfrom Oregon to Philadelphia. Bliss it was to be an American that year, and to be young—or at least, as I was, a young tour guide in 18th-century "small clothes" and formal white wig—was very heaven.

Certainly, a major reason for today’s chillier atmosphere lies with the way we have written the history of the American Revolution in the last 50 years. Like much of American historiography, historians of the Revolutionary era have increasingly moved from the history of individuals and moments to the social history of long-term economic and cultural movements, and that means battles and generals figure in substantially less prominent ways.

Another reason for the subdued atmosphere in 2025 is the turn in popular history and teaching toward political pessimism about the Revolution itself. The opening essays of The 1619 Project, for instance, recast the Revolutionary era in more critical terms than the Bicentennial did. But they are the product of a time of diminished confidence in American institutions, and so it becomes easier to attach the same discounted enthusiasm to the Revolution.

Which is not to say that the older mode of great-men-and-great-battles has been completely cast aside. George Washington seems to be the subject, on average, of a new book every year. Kevin Weddle’s The Compleat Victory: Saratoga and the American Revolution (2021) is the finest military history ever written on a Revolutionary battle; Stacy Schiff’s The Revolutionary: Sam Adams (2022) drags out of the political shadows one of the most talented rabble-rousers American politics ever produced; and the dean of American Revolutionary historians, Gordon Wood, provides one of the most cogent summaries of the move to independence in Power and Liberty: Constitutionalism in the American Revolution (2021).

Even America’s quondam enemies have harvested a fine crop of specialty biographies. Andrew Roberts’s remarkable 2021 biography of George III almost makes the "last king of America" likable; Andrew Jackson O’Shaughnessy presents us with a collective biography of 10 British generals in The Men Who Lost America (2014) who were certainly not the incompetent Colonel Blimps they have often been made out to be.

And then there is Rick Atkinson.

Atkinson made his first career in journalism, covering defense issues in the 1980s. In 1982, he snagged a Pulitzer for a series of stories on a Vietnam-devastated West Point class, stories which became his first book, The Long Gray Line: The American Journey of West Point’s Class of 1966.

The success of The Long Gray Line created too great a temptation not to return to the same pump, and after leaving newspapers in 1999, he set to work on a massive narrative trilogy on the U.S. Army in the Second World War’s European theater, An Army at Dawn (2002), The Day of Battle (2007), and The Guns at Last Light (2013). It was from there that he took an even longer step back in time, to the American Revolution, with the first book in a new trilogy, The British Are Coming: The War for America, Lexington to Princeton, 1775-1777, in 2019. The Fate of the Day, just released, is the second volume of Atkinson’s Revolutionary trilogy.

It is one of the conceits of journalism that reporters write "the first draft of history." It is one of the conceits of historians that we are likely to respond, "Yes, and that’s why historians are around to write the final draft and correct all the mistakes." The same, however, should not be said of Atkinson. He has the journalist’s stylistic flair but a stupendous appetite for research that would put many a gray-haired Ph.D. to shame. Even more, he has an admirable reserve of judgment which prevents him from rushing too far, too fast.

Above all, for this 250th anniversary, Atkinson loves the ins-and-outs of military planning, strategy, and tactics, not unmixed with a canny eye for the flow of politics and political personalities, whether in Philadelphia, London, or Versailles. (He is, after all, an Army brat, like myself.) The result, in The Fate of the Day, is a massive, and massively enjoyable, excursion into the embattled history of the American republic, its imperial British enemy, and its opportunistic ally, France.

It is one of Atkinson’s convictions in both The British Are Coming and The Fate of the Day that Britain and its leaders were, even with the keenest of intentions, their own worst enemies. Britain’s North American colonies emerged from the trauma of the Seven Years’ War as grateful and devoted children of the Hanoverian crown and its newest representative, George III. What the imperial planners in London never quite fathomed was that this reverence was built on generations of improvised self-government in America, which the Americans saw no reason to surrender once the British government decided to impose an unprecedented series of direct taxes on them. It was not that the taxes were necessarily onerous; it was that they were imposed roughshod, without a by-your-leave to American habits.

It exploded when the Boston Tea Party turned to the outright destruction of property. No one was angered more seriously than the king, who insisted that unless the Americans were brought to heel, the rest of the empire—Ireland, India, and the Caribbean—would go the same way.

The British generals to whom this task was given—Sir William Howe, Sir Henry Clinton, Earl Cornwallis, "Gentlemanly Johnny" Burgoyne—were neither nitwits nor tyrants, and if we are to judge by the opening chapters of The Fate of the Day, they were remarkably close to winning their war in 1777. Burgoyne’s capture of Fort Ticonderoga in July 1777 should have guaranteed the success of his plan to move down the Hudson River Valley and cut off rebellious New England from the rest of the American rebel states; Howe’s dramatic combined-arms operation to capture Philadelphia steamrolled George Washington’s Continental Army at Brandywine in September, threw off a counterattack at Germantown in October, and consigned the Continentals to their dreadful winter encampment at Valley Forge.

But Howe’s adventure to Philadelphia left him unable to support Burgoyne when "Gentlemanly Johnny" was forced into surrender at Saratoga in October 1777. Howe himself had already concluded that the war was unwinnable and never lifted a finger to disturb Washington at Valley Forge. The Saratoga victory convinced the French that the British were vulnerable to a serious effort to recover France’s New World empire, and with the French entrance into the war, the principal theaters of operations had to be shifted elsewhere by Britain. Britain’s generals in America would still win a few dramatic victories, but they would lose the biggest battle at Yorktown in 1781, and after that, American independence only required the official stamp of the 1783 peace treaty.

The Fate of the Day stretches from the high point of British military fortunes in America through a steady slide that even the British capture of Savannah in 1778 and Charleston in 1780 cannot reverse. If some of this conjures up faint echoes of a similar slide of military fortunes in Indochina almost two centuries later, that is probably not a misjudgment. Along the way, though, Atkinson wants us to see how much the Revolution worked a kind of political, military, and diplomatic alchemy in America. In a new republic plagued by bickering, we found strength out of the bickering. In a land of farmers, immigrants, and merchants, we found the most unlikely and marvelous leaders. In a crisis that gave plenty of excuse for replacing one monarchy with another, we found a general whose political reserve never allowed him to step across the line that would undo a republic (just as Cromwell undid the English republic more than a century before). Atkinson makes no secret of his frank admiration for Washington, and largely because Washington understood a single basic fact about his soldiers and his countrymen—that they must be reasoned with, not bludgeoned.

Given the shortness of time, we will probably not mount a celebration in 2026 that matches the raucous scale of 1976. But having in hand Rick Atkinson’s new trilogy—and especially The Fate of the Day—will be no small compensation.

 

The Fate of the Day: The War for America, Fort Ticonderoga to Charleston, 1777-1780
by Rick Atkinson
Crown, 880 pp., $42

Allen C. Guelzo is the Thomas W. Smith Distinguished Research Scholar in the James Madison Program at Princeton University and a Non-Resident Fellow of the American Enterprise Institute.

The post Getting the Revolution Right appeared first on .

Posted by Patrick Parr

Mark Twain (real name Samuel Clemens) continues to make news, whether in unabashed reverence by comedian Conan O’Brien as he accepted this year’s Mark Twain Prize for American Humor, or in defamation by countless school boards who have banned The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, which uses the "n-word" 219 times.

Huck, first published in America in January 1885, also inspired Percival Everett’s wildly successful 2024 novel James, a POV re-pivot focusing on Huck’s black friend and escaped slave, Jim. In comedy and contemporary literature, Twain’s shadow remains a long one, 115 years after his death.

For years, biographer Ron Chernow has been wrestling with Twain’s shadow, and now his latest effort, Mark Twain, at well over 1,000 pages, leaves no archival stone unturned. As he has done with J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and Ulysses S. Grant, Chernow, 76, takes five to eight years to complete his meticulously researched biographies.

But for Twain, I did have my doubts. If you’re familiar with Chernow’s work, you understand that banking and politics appear to be his comfort zones, and I wondered if his choice—a fierce satirist enamored with teenage girls—had been affected by how Twain had helped former president Grant with his memoirs. That story was laid out wonderfully by Mark Perry’s 2004 dual bio Grant and Twain.

When it comes to Twain, so much has already been documented. As Chernow notes in his acknowledgments, Twain, upon his death in 1910, left behind hundreds of unpublished manuscripts. The Mark Twain Papers over at Berkeley has already scoured through thousands of pages, organizing Twain’s autobiography into three volumes, and NewSouth Books saw a market large enough to publish Huck Finn without the n-word.

It's worth noting that, regarding Huck’s Jim as a character, Chernow is succinct: "Whatever the shortcomings of Twain’s presentation of Jim, the Black man emerges as the morally superior figure in the story, surrounded by an appalling menagerie of whites who cheat, scheme, lie, and kill."

Mark Twain is so much more than the eccentric writer who wrote Innocents Abroad, Huck Finn, and Tom Sawyer; he is a cultural institution. Raised in "sleepy" Hannibal, Missouri, Twain watched as the small town came to life whenever a steamboat chugged its way up and down the Mississippi River. He dreamed of being a steamboat pilot, and it was this profession Chernow highlights where Twain found the most peace and freedom, writing a distant second. "In truth," wrote Twain, "every man and woman and child has a master, and worries and frets in servitude; but in the day I write of, the Mississippi pilot had none."

When not on the river, Twain, son of a distant, cash-strapped father—who died when Sam was 11—and adoring mother, became a prankster around town, ever craving the attention it brought. Eventually, young Sam settled into the escapism that the world of books provides.

As Chernow eloquently puts it:

In the manner of all autodidacts, Sam Clemens educated himself by reading from passion, not duty. He retained his boyhood fondness for The Adventures of Robin Hood, both the "quaint & simple … fragrant & woodsy England" as well as its characters, "the most darling sweet rascals that ever made crime graceful in this world." He and close friend Will Bowen would "undress & play Robin Hood in our shirt-tails, with lath swords, in the woods on Holliday’s Hill on those long summer days." Confined in the remote little town, Sam escaped into the far away exploits of Robinson Crusoe, The Arabian Nights, and The Count of Monte Cristo, which gave intimations of the boundless world "curtained away" beyond Hannibal.

Chernow has an ability, musical almost, to deploy a quote just long enough (note that three-dot ellipsis) to give the moment its veracity yet not impede upon narrative momentum. Another critical part of a Chernow reading experience is interacting with his endnotes. There are 75 pages of them, carried in two columns per page. Each endnote is thrifty, and the section includes a glossary of acronyms at the start. In the paragraph above, there are three endnotes—citing letters from three primary sources—clearly showing where the quotations come from.

If you think this is standard, well, you haven’t been reading a lot of biographies lately. It should be. The least a biographer can do is pave the way for someone else to keep the journey going.

It was after Twain’s father died that his career working as a printer started. Twain’s much older brother Orion was already working as a printer and sending money home from St. Louis. Twain preferred work to school, his time in the classroom a short-lived exercise, with Twain only attending "part-time" until he was 14.

Chernow brings to life these no-wage years working as a printer’s apprentice at various newspapers in a chapter aptly called "Printer’s Devil." It’s also during this time when Twain gets to know, for better or worse, Orion, who moved back to Hannibal and eventually started the Hannibal Journal. Orion, 10 years older than Twain, had been affected far more than his younger brother when it came to their father’s personal and financial shortcomings. As Chernow puts it, "the shadow of his father’s hardship fell heavily across his life."

The relationship between the brothers is fascinating, and Chernow wisely builds upon the work of Philip Ashley Fanning’s Mark Twain and Orion Clemens: Brothers, Partners, Strangers, and uses letters from various archives across the United States to give each brother their own voice: "Both Orion and Sam were dreamers," writes Chernow, "but Sam had a tough, hardheaded practicality that would enable him to succeed, whereas Orion was an endearing oddball whose naivete would always serve as a whetstone that sharpened his younger brother’s cynicism."

Twain lived a packed life. At 17, out of frustration toward Orion and a desire for adventure, he left Hannibal for New York and Philadelphia, writing articles and taking printing jobs, exasperated by the explosion of immigrants. "I always thought the eastern people were patterns of uprightness," Twain wrote to Orion, "but I never before saw so many whisky-swilling, God-despising heathens as I find in this part of the country." Chernow also notes Twain’s evolving feelings over seeing black people free for the first time. Back then at least, Twain preferred talking with "a good, old-fashioned negro" back in Missouri.

Eventually, Twain went back to work for Orion, now married and living in Keokuk, Iowa. Chernow could have filled another thousand pages tracking Twain’s movements in his 20s; the printer/riverboat pilot/writer/pro-Confederacy militia soldier (for two weeks)/Nevada silver rush miner was in constant motion. Chernow notes "early February 1863" as the time when the first "Mark Twain" byline appeared in print. To Twain, the pseudonym, as Chernow puts it, "was short and melodious—a perfect spondee."

By 31, Twain had slowed down… a little, and was looking for companionship. "Beneath his ribald mockery," Chernow writes, "Twain was a suppressed romantic who needed a spotless soul to worship." To describe Twain’s marriage to Olivia Langdon, or "Livy," Chernow again dives into archival correspondence, while also using long-ago efforts of Twain estate editor Dixon Wecter and his 1949 collection, The Love Letters of Mark Twain. The result is a sweeping, 34-year love story that somehow endured losing their first-born son Langdon at 19 months. Twain’s devotion to Livy is admirable, but more so was Livy’s patience and stamina. How she somehow managed Twain’s lifelong wanderlust deserves its own book, and for readers curious about Livy’s perspective on her marriage with Twain, a great place to start is Barbara Snedecor’s Gravity: Selected Letters of Olivia Langdon Clemens, published in 2023.

As far as Chernow documents, Twain was faithful to Livy, and when she passed in 1904, the then mega-famous writer was devastated, and for the last six years of his life, he appeared at times embittered and lost, his north star vanished.

Twain, writes Chernow, had a "lifelong fixation on chaste teenage girls on the eve of adulthood," and the biographer, credit to him, does not shy away from this shadowy, even "creepy" aspect of Twain’s personality. In fact, Chernow leans in, mentioning how one biographer, Gary Scharnhorst, accused Twain of being a "latent pedophile" whose actions were shielded from public view by his inner circle (another Twain biographer, Ron Powers, shied away from the topic). With an assist from Karen Lystra’s comprehensive Twain study, Dangerous Intimacy, Chernow manages to occupy middle ground on this issue, presenting just enough material for the reader to reach their own conclusion.

Twain was far from a perfect soul. He was bizarre, irreverent, boundary-pushing, and distinctly American. Chernow rightly ends with Twain’s greatest magician’s trick, completing his own 400,000-word autobiography and scheduling it to be published 100 years after his death. As Chernow puts it, "His clever tongue, full of vinegar and wit, suddenly spoke from beyond the grave. Even in death, he refused to yield the spotlight and showed with a flourish his posthumous mastery of public relations."

Twain’s strongest spiritual successor was arguably satirist Kurt Vonnegut (1922–2007). In a 1987 conversation with Hank Nuwer, Vonnegut, whose curly hair and mustache look was inspired by Twain (with a dash of Hal Holbrook), said he was "very suspicious" of "people’s fondness for Mark Twain, because everybody pretends to have read him and very few people have." Indeed, unless your name is Ken Burns, or past Twain biographers Scharnhorst and Powers, Twain remains as familiar to the public as a postage stamp. With this monumental book, Chernow gives Twain dimension and verve.

A favorite "Twainism" of mine comes from one of his notebooks, dated 1886: "My books are water; those of the great geniuses is wine. Everybody drinks water." I’ll go ahead and declare Chernow’s Twain a smooth lager that goes down easy after a long day, but it doesn’t merit a six-pack. That’s because the power of Mark Twain lies far more in his own voice delivered by his own pen than in the hardscrabble life he led. The stakes in Twain feel smaller compared with Chernow’s Grant or Alexander Hamilton. There’s a level of tedium here that Chernow, despite his incredible skill, cannot escape. To take one example, Chernow does well in laying out what he deems "the bloodiest literary feud" of Twain’s life, between Twain and journalist Edward H. House. Again, Chernow leans on a strong secondary source, James L. Huffman’s A Yankee in Meiji Japan, and combines it with archival correspondence between the two men. But Burr vs. Hamilton this is not.

Adjust your stakes, find a comfortable recliner, and open that beer. Chernow is back, but in a minor key.

Mark Twain
by Ron Chernow
Penguin Press, 1,200 pp., $45

Patrick Parr is the author of Malcolm Before X and One Week in America: The 1968 Notre Dame Literary Festival and a Changing Nation.

The post Mark Twain Gets the Chernow Treatment appeared first on .

Posted by Dan Mitchell

I’m baffled that anybody who is both knowledgeable and well-meaning can choose some strain of collectivism (socialism, fascism, communism, etc) over capitalism.

It should be a slam dunk for free enterprise, assuming the goal is better lives for ordinary people.

Indeed, both entries for my 2025 Counter-Tweet of the Year contest involve the superiority of capitalism over statism.

  • Chris Freiman’s response to someone praising China’s economic approach over the U.S. approach.
  • Jeremy Horpedahl’s response to someone making the absurd claim that capitalism produces poverty.

Today, I’m going to add a third contestant for counter-tweet of the year. And it happens to be another entry from Chris Freiman.

Here’s his response to someone who shared a quote about the supposed superiority of socialism.

The map comparing South Korea and North Korea is one of the strongest arguments for the superiority of free markets.

But I can’t resist a brief diversion to make a different point.

The quote is from Deng Xiaoping, who actually deserves credit for the the partial liberalization of the Chinese economy.

So I’ve always wondered whether his theory of “socialism with Chinese characteristics” was simply a way of pretending to be a good communist while moving his nation in the right direction.

The bad news is that his nation only went about one-fourth of the way as far as was/is needed for China to become a rich nation. So maybe an explicit rejection of socialism is needed for China to make the next big step in the right direction.

But I’m digressing. The main focus of today’s column is all about debunking the silly notion that socialism can produce better results than capitalism.

Вчера задремал днем, и приснилось мне, что я на встрече рационалистов, и какой-то чувак в черной футболке и очках доказывает мне, что нужно срочно поменять, как устроены полеты. Дело в том, говорит он, что например в самолете из Тель-Авива в Лондон есть как люди, которые летят в Лондон, чтобы потом вернуться, так и те, которые уже возвращаются. В одном и том же самолете - летящие туда и летящие обратно, это неправильно. Нужно располовинить и вместо каждого рейса сделать два: в одном только летящие туда, в другом обратно. Но зачем, спрашиваю я, чем плохо то, как это устроено сейчас? И ведь это будет много денег стоить, самолеты будет труднее заполнить. Он говорит да, есть определенные сложности, но все это оправдает себя, когда мы введем версии городов. Какие еще версии городов? Ну очень просто, ты вылетаешь из Тель-Авива-1 и прилетаешь в Лондон-2, а возвращаешься обратно в Тель-Авив-1. Сейчас во всех больших городах перенаселение, дома и квартиры жутко дорогие, на улицах толпы. В Лондоне-2 те же дома и квартиры, но люди только те, кто туда прилетели специально из какого-то города-1. Если понравилось, можно остаться там жить. Или полететь вообще в Тель-Авив-3. Очень скоро везде будет не так многолюдно и очень приятно. Но для этого нужно, чтобы про каждый рейс было ясно, он летит туда, то есть плюс 1, или возвращается обратно, минус 1. А если людей к этому не приучить заранее, они будут путаться и возникнет полный хаос, сказал он и поправил очки и я проснулся.

туда или обратно

May. 24th, 2025 06:33 pm[personal profile] avva
avva: (Default)
Вчера задремал днем, и приснилось мне, что я на встрече рационалистов, и какой-то чувак в черной футболке и очках доказывает мне, что нужно срочно поменять, как устроены полеты. Дело в том, говорит он, что например в самолете из Тель-Авива в Лондон есть как люди, которые летят в Лондон, чтобы потом вернуться, так и те, которые уже возвращаются. В одном и том же самолете - летящие туда и летящие обратно, это неправильно. Нужно располовинить и вместо каждого рейса сделать два: в одном только летящие туда, в другом обратно. Но зачем, спрашиваю я, чем плохо то, как это устроено сейчас? И ведь это будет много денег стоить, самолеты будет труднее заполнить. Он говорит да, есть определенные сложности, но все это оправдает себя, когда мы введем версии городов. Какие еще версии городов? Ну очень просто, ты вылетаешь из Тель-Авива-1 и прилетаешь в Лондон-2, а возвращаешься обратно в Тель-Авив-1. Сейчас во всех больших городах перенаселение, дома и квартиры жутко дорогие, на улицах толпы. В Лондоне-2 те же дома и квартиры, но люди только те, кто туда прилетели специально из какого-то города-1. Если понравилось, можно остаться там жить. Или полететь вообще в Тель-Авив-3. Очень скоро везде будет не так многолюдно и очень приятно. Но для этого нужно, чтобы про каждый рейс было ясно, он летит туда, то есть плюс 1, или возвращается обратно, минус 1. А если людей к этому не приучить заранее, они будут путаться и возникнет полный хаос, сказал он и поправил очки и я проснулся.

Научный прорыв

May. 24th, 2025 02:40 pm[personal profile] vit_r
vit_r: default (Default)
"Шеф! Оно опять не сходится!" - аспирант Ли ворвался в кабинет, но запнулся, зажмурил глаза и захлопнул дверь даже быстрее, чем из неё вышел.

Профессор Дик снял руку с бедра сидевшего перед ним на столе секретаря, поправил галстук и, для солидности выждав минуту, громко крикнул: "Кто там ломится без стука! У меня двери всегда открыты! Войдите!"

Полусогнутый Ли осторожно вплыл в кабинет, искоса поглядывая на уже сидевшего за секретарским столом Джона, который увлечённо вперился в свой смартфон и, казалось, не замечал ничего вокруг. Но Ли знал злопамятность Джона, увидел косо скошенную бровь и его передёрнуло.

Стараясь казаться ещё более незаметным, Ли приблизился к столу шефа и положил на него распечатку.

Профессор Дик взял её и долго разглядывал. Потом покачал головой и спросил в пространство: "Почему не сходится? Наша теория верная!"

Ли ещё более сжался и тихим бесцветным голосом выдавил: "Ваша теория верная. Но посчитать не получается. Какой-то русский писал программу расчётов и там во время сглаживания данных происходит сбой. В одном модуле. Непонятно что делает. Что-то проверяет, а потом выдаёт ошибку."

"Какой модуль? Как называется?"

Ли осторожно ткнул в угол бумажки: "Вот тут. Специально записал: 'Sovest'"

"Какая 'Sovest'!" -- вспылил профессор, -- "Опять эти русские ужимки! Мы занимаемся на-у-кой! К чёрту 'Sovest'! Выбросить нафиг!"

"Будет сделано! Сегодня же к вечеру!" -- Ли цапнул бумажку со стола, юркнул назад и растворился за дверью.

Профессор Дик нервно потёр руки.

"Придумают тоже. Разложат всякую фигню на пути прогресса. Хорошо, что тогда выгнали идиота..."

Профессор откинулся в кресле, повернулся к Джону и спросил: "Ну, что там у нас".

"Нашёл!" -- радостно выпалил Джон. -- "Наконец-то нашёл розовые колготки с блёстками!"




Это было по поводу стенаний климатолога. (https://vit-r.dreamwidth.org/1272942.html?thread=13905518#cmt13905518) И про прочее разное. Финны с моделью снега просто офигительное сделали. Будет время, напишу.

Posted by Washington Free Beacon Editors

Morally adrift: The terror attack outside Washington’s Jewish museum isn’t just another senseless act of violence—it’s a symptom of a society that has lost its moral bearings, writes the Hudson Institute’s Mike Watson.

Like sailors drinking sea water out of desperation, Watson argues that America’s institutions have turned to poisonous ideas—radical anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism, and revolutionary socialism—that may momentarily "relieve a parched throat" but ultimately corrode. "Healthy societies tend to repel self-defeating bigotries," he writes, but "it’s the sick ones that drink the saltwater." From the 2017 congressional baseball shooting to the more recent glorification of leftist killers like Luigi Mangione, Watson sees a pattern of escalating violence that’s no longer being filtered out by civic norms or leadership.

"This civilization is in peril, but it still has the intellectual and spiritual resources to prevail. Out of Nuremberg recently came a young man, a Christian who embraced the Jewish people and represented Israel here in Washington. He met a young Jewish woman from Kansas, and they planned out their lives together. They stood for their people, and died for it," Watson writes of the two victims of Wednesday’s embassy shooting. "We need more Yaron Lischinskys and Sarah Milgrims."

READ MORE: Awash in Anti-Semitism

"Mostly peaceful" terrorism: The terrorist who murdered two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, was a big fan of Jewish Voice for Peace, an anti-Zionist group that claims to represent "Jewish leftists," reports our Alana Goodman. Elias Rodriguez shared a November 2023 post from the group’s Chicago chapter promoting a pro-Hamas protest against the Israeli consulate. The post accused Israel of "genocidal violence" and included an image of masked protesters, many of whom were clad in terrorist-style keffiyehs.

Rodriguez had a hand-written sign in his Chicago apartment window reading "Tikkun Olam Means Free Palestine"—echoing JVP’s Northwestern chapter, which painted nearly the same phrase on campus in October. JVP frequently uses the phrase Tikkun Olam—Hebrew for "healing the world"—as a rhetorical vehicle for opposing Israel’s existence.

Within hours after Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre, JVP issued a statement justifying the attacks and blaming them on "Israeli apartheid and occupation" and "United States complicity." The group has also celebrated convicted terrorists, including airplane hijacker Leila Khaled and supermarket bomber Rasmea Odeh, while calling Islamic Jihad members "political prisoners." A recent lawsuit filed on behalf of Oct. 7 victims accused JVP of serving as a "propaganda arm" for Hamas.

READ MORE: Israeli Embassy Terrorist Promoted 'Anti-Zionist' Jewish Voice for Peace

Harvard backpedals: The Harvard Law Review has quietly stripped references to race and gender from its application process amid mounting pressure from the Trump administration, reports our Aaron Sibarium. The change comes just weeks after the administration launched a federal investigation into the journal’s use of racial preferences.

"The journal told prospective editors on May 1—three days after the Trump administration began investigating the law review for race discrimination—that they would be encouraged to disclose a slew of protected characteristics as part of their ‘holistic review statement,’" Sibarium writes. But a revised prompt, distributed May 18, asked only about applicants’ "perspectives, experiences, and viewpoints"—with no mention of identity categories. Lawyers say the original language could serve as evidence of discrimination in the federal case against Harvard.

The Trump administration’s investigations into the school are part of its broader campaign to defund and discipline Harvard over allegations of ideological bias and campus anti-Semitism. On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard’s ability to enroll foreign students, citing "pro-terrorist conduct" at campus protests.

READ MORE: Harvard Law Review Scrubs Race From Application Process Amid Federal Probe

In other news:

  • The father of Elias Rodriguez, the man charged with murdering two Israeli embassy staffers on Wednesday, was invited to President Donald Trump’s joint address to Congress in March by Rep. Jesús "Chuy" García (D., Ill.), the New York Post reported. García praised Eric Rodriguez at the time as "an outspoken advocate against attacks on veterans’ services and the rights of unionized federal employees."
  • The Washington Post is facing backlash over a post from its official X account claiming that Wednesday’s Israeli embassy killings "amplify confusion" about "where Jews belong."

The post Awash in Anti-Semitism. Plus, Israeli Embassy Terrorist Promoted Far-Left Jewish 'Peace' Group. appeared first on .

Posted by Jon Levine

Some people just aren't that interesting.

But for the sake of transparency, the Washington Free Beacon is publishing the names of the yet-reported anti-Israel radicals arrested after storming Columbia University’s Butler Library earlier this month.

They aren't celebrity nepo babies, or phallus-obsessed poets, or silver spoon activists, or do much for search engine optimization—but they were still part of a violent raid that injured two, distributed pro-Hamas flyers, and damaged university property.

Below are the names of the individuals arrested on May 7. All but one was charged with criminal trespassing for storming the Columbia library, while the outlier, Hamza Mankor, was charged with misconduct and threatening behavior. The vast majority were students of Columbia or its affiliates, Barnard College and Union Theological Seminary.

Columbia University Students

Nisreen Khokhar, a J.D. candidate at Columbia Law School, signed several anti-Israel letters before her arrest. Just days after Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack, while she was an undergraduate at the University of Michigan, Khokhar signed one that falsely accused Israel of committing genocide and called for an immediate ceasefire. She signed a second that was distributed following an anti-Israel demonstration inside a school building that resulted in 40 arrests in November 2023. It demanded the school divest from companies that do business in Israel and shut down their partnerships with Israeli universities. She was the first signatory on both letters.

Priyanka Joshi is a Columbia senior studying philosophy and evolutionary biology. Joshi pursued a dual degree with Trinity College Dublin, according to a webpage for the program that has since scrubbed her presence. She’s quoted on the page saying, "You don't have to have a reason for everything you do." She's currently seeking an internship in New York City, according to her now-deleted LinkedIn.

Jessie Rubin, a Ph.D candidate in ethnomusicology at Columbia, has long been a member of several anti-Israel groups, including Student Workers of Columbia (SWC), Students for Justice in Palestine, and Jewish Voice for Peace. She also helped form Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD)—the Ivy League school’s most notorious anti-Semitic group that took credit for the Butler Library storming. Her father, Jeff Melnick, is a professor of American studies at University of Massachusetts Boston and describes himself as an "anti-Zionist." Hours after two young Israeli embassy staffers were killed in a brutal, close-range shooting, Melnick posted a defense of the slaying, arguing that "taking one life is not like killing all of humanity."

Brenda Gonzalez is a Columbia senior pursuing a double major in ethnicity and race studies and education. She is an occasional contributor to the San Francisco-based Spanish-language newspaper El Tecolote, where she has produced such pieces as "8 Latinx events that center community and resistance in San Francisco" and "These 7 S.F. organizations support undocumented immigrants. Here’s what they offer."

Two weeks after Matthew Ware’s arrest, he graduated from Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health and was inducted into the school’s Delta Omega Honor Society, which was established to "recognize outstanding achievement in the field of public health."

Nadia Schwingle listed herself as a Barnard alumna in a November 2023 petition demanding Columbia reinstate the university’s Students for Justice in Palestine chapter after it was suspended for repeatedly holding unauthorized anti-Israel protests. A university directory notes she is affiliated with Columbia’s School of Social Work.

Pramit Ghatak is a Columbia undergraduate studying computer science, according to university records. She signed a "dancers for Palestine" petition last year to show her solidarity. "Dance does not get an exception from the political realities of the places and times it is created," the petition read. "May we dance into liberation soon."

Ysabelle Tiana "Bell" Santos is pursuing a Masters of Social Work at Columbia. "I am for equity because equity starts with everyone," she touted in a now-deleted LinkedIn page. In the past, she has worked as a behavioral therapist for the Manhattan Psychology Group.

Fatima Aamir is a student at Columbia’s Teachers College, according to the school’s student directory. When she’s not agitating for Hamas, she works as a therapist for Manhattan Alternative, which provides "nationwide kink, poly, trans & LGBQ affirmative providers," according to its website.

"I create a therapeutic space where healing, self-exploration, and empowerment come together. I honor that we live in a world of interconnected systems, where the flow of power can impact each of us differently. Together, we can create ways for you to connect more deeply with yourself and the worlds around you by channeling the safety of hope," Aamir offers.

Hayes Buchanan graduated from Columbia in 2021 with a M.S. in urban planning, according to his LinkedIn profile. After finishing college, he moved to Lebanon, where he has spent more than three years working for Beirut Urban Labs.

Buchanan has a passion for environmental justice, equitable international development, and decolonization, according to his website. In May 2021, he told a Columbia blog that President Donald Trump’s election in 2016 motivated him to become politically active. Buchanan also said he was motivated to pursue his degree by Hiba Bou Akar, who acted as security for the second pro-Hamas encampment.

Ayah Fakhy is a Columbia College student in the class of 2025. She is pursuing a bachelor’s degree with double majors in political science and sustainability studies and a minor in statistics, according to public records. Before attending college, she was active in Black Lives Matter Los Angeles, where she served as a "youth vanguard member." She also worked as a production assistant for Netflix.

Ben Patricia Erdmann, the chief engineer of Columbia University’s student radio station WKCR, pursued urban studies and art history at the Ivy League school. He’s slated to start a Ph.D. in art history at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in the fall, his now-deleted LinkedIn notes.

Amena Aamir is a Columbia student associated with its Teachers College, according to the university’s student directory.

Valerie Yang is pursuing a bachelor's degree in history at Columbia, according to her LinkedIn.

Daniel Fu is a student at Columbia's Institute for Comparative Literature and Society, according to the student directory.

Jenna Elizabeth Price announced plans to attend Columbia to study visual art. Before it was removed, her entry in the Columbia student directory noted that she was studying in the religion department.

Belan Yeshigeta is a Kluge Scholar at Columbia, according to her now-deleted LinkedIn. The program aims to serve "underrepresented minority students."

Mairead Hynes is a Ph.D. student in the history department "studying the comparative transpacific history of women’s war mobilization and anti-military feminism in 20th century Japan and the United States."

Aeden Kamadolli is a Columbia sophomore majoring in human rights.

Mohsin Kazim is a master's student at Columbia's School of Social Work, according to his deleted LinkedIn.

Barnard College Students

Safiya Isabella O'Brien is a Barnard undergraduate who was an officer with Columbia’s Students for Justice in Palestine chapter. She has a lengthy profile with the watchdog group, Canary Mission, which notes that she began publicly supporting Hamas just one day after Oct 7. In December 2023, she whined in the Columbia Spectator that she didn't always feel safe wearing a keffiyeh.

Hayden Moir Chernow, meanwhile, attended Boston Latin Academy, a public exam institution ranked as a top-20 school, and resided in a five-bedroom, million-dollar home, before heading to Barnard.

She’s a member of the college’s prestigious Laidlaw Scholars Leadership & Research Program, sponsored by the Laidlaw Foundation, an international nonprofit dedicated to "developing leaders who embody excellence, act with integrity, and who are driven to solve the world’s most intractable problems." Her research examines how the rising number of young refugees affects access to quality education in Jordan.

After the Free Beacon emailed Moir Chernow to seek comment on her arrest, one of her mothers, Susan Moir, responded via Instagram. "Get a real life, you running dog for the MAGA movement," she told the Free Beacon reporter. When asked for further comment, the elder Moir deactivated her Instagram account. Her Instagram bio had read, "Palestine will be free. Stop the Israeli genocide in Gaza. Stop all military aid to Israel. Divest from all complicit corporations."

Eva Salmon is a Barnard undergraduate in the department of political science, has held leadership positions in Barnard’s student government, and is expected to graduate in 2026. Before becoming an anti-Israel activist, most of her energy had been focused on climate change. She has previously worked as an intern at the Climate Campus Network and was a board member of Sunrise Columbia, which tackled environmental issues at the university.

Cody Cragun was the salutatorian of Rio Rancho High School’s Class of 2022 in New Mexico and attends Barnard.

Melaina Rose Moy, who touts "she/her" pronouns, is a diversity and inclusion coordinator in the Barnard class of 2026. She is matriculated in the school's department of psychology.

When she's not raging for Hamas, Barnard student Maimuna Islam enjoys babysitting and making handmade jewelry, according to her LinkedIn.

Union Theological Seminary Students

Maya Andonina Weber—a Union Theological Seminary student who identifies as "they/she"—proudly notes her enrollment in a class called "Queer Theology," taught by the Rev. Dr. Patrick Cheng. Cheng, an expert in "Queer Anglicanism,"  serves as chancellor of the Episcopal Diocese of New York.

Katherine Scott is a Union Theological Seminary student, according to Columbia's student directory.

New York University

While the rest of the arrestees were charged with third-degree trespassing, Mankor distinguished himself with misconduct and threatening behavior. Mankor is a doctoral student at New York University in the comparative literature Ph.D. program and J.D. candidate at the School of Law, according to an official NYU biography that has since been taken down.

Mankor lists "Critical theory, Black study, Indigenous studies, anarchist studies, anticoloniality, Africana and Arab existentialism" among his research interests. He is a longtime agitator and was labeled persona non grata in NYU buildings last year as a result of his past activism.

None of the schools listed above responded to requests for comment, nor did any of the contacted students. The following arrestees could not be reached since their contact information was scrubbed: Joshi, Gonzalez, Kamadoll, Kazim, Cragun, and Islam.

Unclear Affiliations

The following individuals were among the arrested, but the Free Beacon could not identify them as students of Columbia or its affiliates. As a result, none of the individuals in this section could be reached for comment.

Zachary Berman was among those arrested during the violent takeover of Columbia's Hamilton Hall last year, The Free Lance reported.

Jingying Lin was also among the arrested. He was previously busted in June 2024. It's unclear if he is affiliated with Columbia.

Allison Rachel Wuu was arrested for a second time in the spring semester after being taken into custody for storming Barnard’s library in March.

One person arrested was named Grace Wang. Columbia’s directory shows several students associated with the university, but the Free Beacon couldn’t determine if she was any of them.

New York Police Department sources also provided the following arrestees, but the Free Beacon could not identify them with certainty: Samuel Pham, Layla Rodriguez Johnson, Jasmine Walker, Henry Mohr Odelle, Katherine Annette Rose, Tiffany Yang, and Sofia Rodriguez Basil.

Previously Reported

The Free Beacon previously identified additional arrestees in the following stories:

Columbia Students Arrested for Storming Library Include Several Repeat Offenders—Including Grad Student Who Demanded Humanitarian Aid From University

11 Percent of Columbia Library Arrestees Identify as They/Them—Nearly 7 Times America's Trans Population

'Corpse of the Phallus,' Black Latex, and Circus Performers: Meet The Avant-Garde Artists Arrested For Violently Storming Columbia Library

Bloomberg Journalist Among Anti-Israel Radicals Arrested for Storming Columbia Library

From Million-Dollar Homes to Radical Activism—These Posh Private School Alumni Were Among the Arrested Columbia and Barnard Students

The post Here’s the Full List of Everyone Arrested for Storming Columbia Library appeared first on .

Posted by Mike Watson

One of the greatest dangers to the crew of a ship that has lost its bearings is also one of the most tempting: the water all around them. As the stores of freshwater run out, and the thirst sets in, the ocean and its contents look ever more inviting. But that way leads to death. A gulp of saltwater may relieve a parched throat for a moment, but it makes the thirst stronger and the body weaker. The only cure is the pure water that sustains life.

As with sailors, so with societies. A people that loses its sense of purpose and direction risks losing the great hearts and sharp eyes needed to regain its bearings. A society awash in Jew-hatred is headed for ruin, and Wednesday’s terrorist attack in Washington reminds us that the United States is such a society.

Wednesday night, a group of four left a reception for young diplomats hosted by the American Jewish Committee at the Capital Jewish Museum. A man affiliated with a variety of left-wing organizations shot at them, turned himself in to the police, and yelled, "Free Palestine." Two Israeli embassy staffers, Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky, died in the attack. Yaron was days away from proposing to Sarah.

The murderer clearly targeted Jews that night, but his bigotry extends beyond them. Previously, he had denounced Amazon’s "whitening of Seattle" as "structurally racist and a direct danger to all workers who live in that city." He feared the United States was becoming "a nation of cities dominated and occupied by massive corporations where only the rich and white can live." The Network Contagion Research Institute reports that his network has troubling ties to the Chinese Communist Party and Iran, too. Anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism walk arm in arm again.

This coward is part of a trend of left-wing murderous terrorism, often but not exclusively aimed at Jews. In 2017, a leftist shot at members of the Republican congressional baseball team. Shortly after October 7, an anti-Israel protester killed a Jewish man voicing his support for Israel. The individual arrested for murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has become a minor celebrity on the socialist left. Wednesday’s alleged murderer is reportedly a big fan.

If they have their way, these people will lead this country to ruin.

Societies that mistreat Jews rarely prosper. The England that expelled its Jews in 1290 was a fractious, violent backwater just off the coast of Europe; the England that welcomed them back in 1656 was developing the culture and habits that made it a global superpower. The Nazis staged many of their great rallies in Nuremberg, but in 1946 10 of their leaders swung from ropes there.

Philosemites tend to do much better. Chalk it up to God’s special favor for the Jewish people, the providence that George Washington relied on, or the fact that free and tolerant people tend to handle challenges admirably. Countries that treat Jews well tend to beat all comers, particularly when their love for Jews is an outgrowth of their love for liberty.

Healthy societies tend to repel self-defeating bigotries; it’s the sick ones that drink the saltwater. The high points of Jew-hatred in American history usually come at the nation’s lowest point. For example, the depraved ravings of "social justice" activists like Father Coughlin found their biggest audience during the Great Depression. America’s economic indicators are not nearly that bad today, but the explosion of suicides, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths tells a much grimmer story. And when the American dream seems out of reach, people often blame the Jews.

In troubled times, a country’s leaders must seek out sources of vitality and strength. In a society as boisterous, complex, and constantly changing as ours, this is a daunting task. America’s institutional leaders are clearly not up to it. They have lost their minds and championed socialist economics, wild social experiments, and poisonous identity politics. Many of these lunatics excuse or even cheer on the Jew-hating mobs that emerged on Oct. 7.

Some of their critics are no better. Many of the people who most loudly condemn the left’s follies and villainies in the next breath excuse their allies who embody the same kinds of Jew-hatred and bigotry.

This civilization is in peril, but it still has the intellectual and spiritual resources to prevail. Out of Nuremberg recently came a young man, a Christian who embraced the Jewish people and represented Israel here in Washington. He met a young Jewish woman from Kansas, and they planned out their lives together. They stood for their people, and died for it.

We need more Yaron Lischinskys and Sarah Milgrims.

The post Awash in Anti-Semitism appeared first on .

beldmit: (Default)
Я дочитал книгу "Падение Робеспьера", где автор собрал достаточно подробную хронологию 9 термидора по показаниям и мемуарам (ну и плюс контекст для тех, кто плохо знает фамилии). Ощущение - как от очень хорошего сводного отчёта по ролёвке 90-х: есть канон, но нет обмена информацией и в любой момент от канона можно уклониться.

Переворот вполне мог навернуться несколькими способами где-то до вечера, а был, судя по выводам автора, почти чистой импровизацией. Не было никакого Фуше, обходящего коллег по Конвенту неделями, как про это любил писать Левандовский, беседы в основном начались после предыдущей неудачной речи Робеспьера в Конвенте, которую тут же на ура приняли у якобинцев.

Кажется, триггером послужило решение Сен-Жюста свой доклад, который он начал делать, коллегам по комитету, вопреки обещаниям, не показывать. Они однозначно считали в этом угрозу заговора (которого не было, судя по рассогласованию действий робеспьеристов).

Ещё одна интересная мысль - что Робеспьер в свои последние дни собирался перенести опору с Горы на Болото.

Вишенка на торте, которую в советских книгах не писали - что храмом Верховного Существа был назначен Нотр-Дам.

Для комплекта - хорошая рецензия от [livejournal.com profile] kislin
https://t.me/kislinhistory/6
https://t.me/kislinhistory/8
https://t.me/kislinhistory/9

Про Алгол X1

May. 24th, 2025 12:53 am[personal profile] vak
vak: (бэсм-6)
ИИ научился создавать качественную техническую документацию. Вот вам к примеру про наш со [personal profile] spamsink  проект Алгола-60 для машины Electrologica X1.

deepwiki.com/sergev/x1-algol-compiler
OSZAR »